Why No Magnets In Galaxy S26? Samsung R&d Chief Explains

Why? I asked Samsung’s Won-Joon Choi, nan executive successful complaint of some R&D and operations for Samsung’s mobile business. He says nan added thickness of magnets is simply a bad tradeoff to make, because you’re conscionable going to bargain a lawsuit anyhow.

“About 80 aliases 90 percent of group are utilizing a case, and cases pinch magnets are very celebrated these days,” he tells me.

Samsung would alternatively usage that other tallness to springiness nan telephone a larger artillery aliases make it thinner, he says.

That doesn’t mean Samsung isn’t looking into magnets. “We’re still doing a batch of investigation to make judge we don’t person immoderate sacrifice wrong nan phone; erstwhile we really execute that, we’ll integrate,” he says.

Personally, I disagree pinch Choi’s premise. I want other artillery and magnets, and I’m consenting to sacrifice thinness to get it. Phones are bladed capable already, isolated from for the ones that fold.

And if Samsung took complaint of nan magnets for illustration Apple, and replicated Apple’s modular shape and strength, possibly nan magnet lawsuit I usage pinch my Galaxy S25 would decently and firmly clasp onto magnetic artillery packs without them rotating successful place. Since there’s nary magnets wrong my phone, I’m astatine nan mercy of casemakers.

But I get it. Why make nan tradeoff if personification will salary for a lawsuit anyhow? Seems for illustration we request to inquire Apple and Google why they chose differently.