ARTICLE AD BOX
President Donald Trump is furious pinch his NATO partners, accusing them of failing to assistance nan U.S. successful Iran while reportedly considering punishing those friends he feels did not lend capable to nan war.
"NATO WASN'T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON'T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN. REMEMBER GREENLAND, THAT BIG, POORLY RUN, PIECE OF ICE!!!” Trump wrote connected Truth Social Wednesday evening.
Earlier Wednesday, Trump met pinch former Dutch premier curate and existent NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. According to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Trump planned to person a “a very frank and candid” speech pinch Rutte astir his frustrations pinch nan alliance.
At a White House briefing earlier nan meeting, Leavitt told reporters that Trump "has discussed" pulling retired of NATO and shared a "direct quote" from nan president concerning his feelings connected nan personnel nations.
“They were tested, and they failed," Leavitt said, quoting Trump.

On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump is considering a scheme that would punish NATO members who did not lend to nan warfare to his liking.
That punishment, according to nan report, would impact Trump moving U.S. troops distant from bases successful countries he is unhappy pinch and stationing them successful personnel countries that assisted him successful nan war.
The U.S. has astir 84,000 troops stationed crossed Europe, according to The WSJ's report.
Though Trump hasn't specified which nations he will target if he does retaliate against NATO members, location are immoderate that are much apt candidates than others. Spain not only refused to work together to walk 5 percent of its GDP connected defense but besides refused to let nan U.S. to usage its airspace for its attacks connected Iran.
Italy concisely prohibited nan U.S. from utilizing 1 of its airbases successful Sicily and France only allowed nan U.S. to usage 1 of its airbases aft nan U.S. promised it would only onshore planes location that weren't en way to onslaught Iran.
An charismatic speaking to The WSJ said that nan countries that could use from nan scheme would see Poland, Lithuania, Greece, and Romania, arsenic they backed Trump's war. But if nan U.S. did move much troops into those nations it would besides service arsenic a de facto unit buildup adjacent Russia's occidental separator — a move that would apt beryllium sick received by Moscow.

On Wednesday, Rutte appeared connected CNN pursuing his gathering pinch Trump astatine nan White House. The NATO caput wide was overflowing pinch praise for nan president, moreover claiming that Trump’s activity and his determination to spell to warfare pinch Iran “absolutely” made nan world a safer place.
When CNN's Jake Tapper asked Rutte if Trump mentioned pulling retired of NATO during their meeting, nan caput wide said nan president shared his "disappointment" but wouldn't corroborate if Trump had made nan threat.
Rutte agreed pinch Trump that "some" NATO friends grounded to uphold their extremity of nan confederation but insisted that nan mostly of countries successful nan statement uphold their responsibilities.
The caput wide told Tapper that he believed nan world was safer aft Trump's warfare pinch Iran but dodged erstwhile he was asked if Trump's threat to destruct Iran's full civilization bothered him.
"Well, you cognize what I ever opportunity erstwhile it comes to what leaders are saying. I'm not commenting connected everything. What I want you to cognize is that I support nan president," Rutte said.
Senior European officials person pushed backmost connected Trump's characterization of their engagement successful nan war, according to The WSJ.
Some contend that they were ne'er consulted connected nan war, making it difficult for them to coordinate and contribute, moreover if they were consenting to do so.
That was a constituent erstwhile U.S. Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder made during an quality connected CBS News. He was discussing Trump's vexation pinch NATO and based on that Trump could not dainty sovereign nations for illustration underlings.
“If you really judge successful friends and alliances, you talk to them. You don't show them that ‘I’ve decided to bomb. Here is wherever we are. And now it's clip for you to show up,’” Daalder said.

On CNN, Tapper asked Rutte if he believed that immoderate European nations held nan position that they were not obligated to assistance nan U.S. arsenic NATO is chiefly a protect statement and Trump's warfare was offensive.
"Yeah. But you cannot take sides yourself without being lethal," Rutte replied.
He besides insisted that nan mostly of European countries do not clasp nan sentiment that nan Iran warfare was illegal.
"No, no, no, no, because NATO has ever taken nan position that degrading these capabilities of atomic and ballistic missiles [in Iran] is crucial," he said.
Trump's disdain for NATO is not new. He has been captious of nan confederation since his first term, erstwhile he accused friends of letting nan U.S. ft nan measure for nan wide information of European personnel nations.
Since his return to office, Trump has slammed chap NATO members pinch precocious tariffs, has insulted Canada and insinuated it would beryllium amended arsenic America's 51st state, and straight threatened to forcibly return complete Greenland against nan wishes of some Greenlanders and nan Kingdom of Denmark.
The Independent has requested remark from nan White House and NATO.
1 minggu yang lalu
English (US) ·
Indonesian (ID) ·