ARTICLE AD BOX
Prior to nan Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell decision, opponents raised alarms astir nan terrible and contiguous harms that would surely hap if marriages betwixt same-sex couples were recognized nationally. Afterward, erstwhile those harms grounded to materialize, those voices grew quieter, but immoderate person been returning pinch renewed vigor, successful hopes that nan existent Supreme Court, aft overturning Roe vs. Wade, whitethorn beryllium consenting to overturn nan Obergefell determination arsenic good — though nan justices declined to do so successful November.
To build nationalist support for rolling backmost matrimony rights, caller campaigns person been repeating nan claims that ineligible nickname of same-sex marriages whitethorn harm children aliases moreover nan stableness of different-sex marriages. These are immoderate of nan aforesaid concerns that were raised successful nan years anterior to nan Obergefell decision. They were groundless then, and, much than 10 years later, nan information corroborate these fears to beryllium unfounded.
In 2024, for nan 20th day of nan first ineligible marriages of same-sex couples (in Massachusetts), my laboratory astatine UCLA joined pinch a squad of researchers astatine Rand Corp. to reappraisal what societal scientists learned complete those 2 decades astir nan consequences of legalizing same-sex marriage.
We addressed this mobility successful 2 ways. First, we searched done nan investigation lit to find each published study that had examined nan consequences of legalizing same-sex marriage. Prior to 2015, states legalized and prohibited same-sex matrimony astatine different times, and societal scientists tracked a wide scope of outcomes, including nan well-being of children, nationalist trends successful matrimony and divorce, and nan beingness and intelligence wellness of same-sex couples. Opponents of legalizing same-sex matrimony predicted, successful nan strongest terms, that group would suffer aft same-sex couples were granted nan correct to marry.
After 20 years of legalized matrimony for same-sex couples, 96 independent studies corroborate location is nary grounds for nan harms critics predicted. Our reappraisal identified not a azygous study that observed important antagonistic consequences of legalizing same-sex marriage. Instead, nan investigation lit identified galore important affirmative consequences.
For same-sex couples, ineligible nickname of their marriages was followed by much unchangeable relationships, accrued intelligence and beingness health, greater financial stability, and stronger connections to family. For nan children of those couples, our reappraisal recovered nary documented antagonistic outcomes, but ineligible nickname of their parents’ marriages did consequence successful more children obtaining entree to wellness insurance. And what astir nan remainder of nan country? States that recognized same-sex marriages anterior to Obergefell knowledgeable economic gains and considerable savings successful healthcare costs comparative to states that did not.
One of nan astir striking predictions of nan opponents of same-sex matrimony was that recognizing matrimony among same-sex couples would weaken committedness to nan institution of matrimony among different-sex couples. That did not hap either.
To reside this question, our study conducted caller analyses, drafting connected census information and different sources to find whether state-level rates of marriage, cohabitation and divorcement changed successful nan states that recognized same-sex marriage, compared pinch states that did not. No matter really we conducted nan analyses, we could find nary effects of recognizing same-sex matrimony connected immoderate of these outcomes. It makes sense: When different-sex couples are making individual decisions astir their ain relationships, they are not paying overmuch attraction to what same-sex couples are doing.
If immoderate harm resulted from allowing same-sex couples to marry, it ought to beryllium good documented by now. The truth that location has been nary grounds of harms contempt sizeable effort to find immoderate suggests that nan predictions made by opponents of legalizing same-sex matrimony were unwarranted astatine nan time. Now that we person 20 years of investigation and experience, those predictions stay unwarranted now.
Benjamin Karney is simply a professor of societal psychology astatine UCLA.
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated study connected Voices contented to connection each points of view. Insights does not look connected immoderate news articles.
This article mostly aligns pinch a Center Left constituent of view. Learn much astir this AI-generated analysis
The pursuing AI-generated contented is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial unit does not create aliases edit nan content.
Ideas expressed successful nan piece
The article argues that investigation from complete 2 decades demonstrates same-sex matrimony legalization produced important benefits for same-sex couples, including much unchangeable relationships, improved intelligence and beingness health, greater financial stability, and stronger family connections[1][2].
The portion contends that children of same-sex couples knowledgeable nary documented antagonistic outcomes pursuing ineligible nickname of their parents’ marriages, while gaining accrued entree to wellness insurance[2].
The file suggests that states recognizing same-sex marriages anterior to nan 2015 Obergefell determination knowledgeable measurable economical gains and sizeable healthcare costs savings compared to states that did not admit specified marriages.
The article maintains that 1 of nan superior concerns raised by opponents—that legalizing same-sex matrimony would weaken committedness to matrimony among different-sex couples—failed to materialize, pinch analyses showing nary effects connected state-level marriage, cohabitation, aliases divorcement rates.
The portion contends that astir 96 independent studies corroborate location is nary grounds for nan harms critics predicted would consequence from legalizing same-sex marriage, and that not a azygous study documented important antagonistic consequences.
Different views connected nan topic
Historically, immoderate researchers suggested imaginable concerns astir children raised by same-sex parents, pinch nan New Family Structures Study initially concluding that group pinch same-sex parents faced greater risks of adverse outcomes including unemployment and little acquisition attainment[3].
Some investigation has indicated that same-sex couples, peculiarly female-female couples, acquisition higher divorcement rates compared to different-sex couples, pinch a 2022 study uncovering female-female marriages had 29% higher divorcement rates comparative to female-male marriages, and that lesbian unions show considerably little stableness than cheery antheral unions[4].
6 hari yang lalu
English (US) ·
Indonesian (ID) ·